Doctor Fact-Checks PLANDEMIC Conspiracy

I mean just it doesn't match up the evidence is pointing against what she's saying I've gotten requests from my friends family members patients and everyone in between to discuss this plan Demick I usually try make my videos on the shorter side but I want to take this one point by point to give you the clearest picture of what my thoughts are on this as a doctor dr. Judy Mike Ovitz has been called one of the most accomplished scientist of her generation so you made a discovery that conflicted with the agreed upon narrative correct quick note before we start the focus of my review here will be based on science and facts for the sake of Education there's very little value in speculating on stories and claims that cannot be verified I am a doctor and not a detective and I don't want to turn this into a character assassination if we don't stop this now we can not only forget our republic in our freedom but we can forget humanity because we'll be killed by this agenda the man who is heading the pandemic task force was involved in a cover-up he directed the cover-up and in fact everybody else was paid off I just want to look at the facts and so far very few facts have been presented when to repeat this phrase I feel like a lot extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence what he's saying is absolute propaganda and and the same kind of propaganda that he's perpetrated to kill millions since 1984 that virus was spread through because of the arrogance of a group of people and it includes Robert Redfield who's now the head of the CDC they were working together to take credit and make money and they had the patents on it and tailored them to il-2 therapy which was absolutely the wrong therapy and had that not happened millions wouldn't have died from HIV when I first saw that I was moved I was like wait can it be possible that these doctors these researchers for major government organizations are making millions of dollars at the expense of millions of people dying so I looked into it and I stumbled upon an article in the British Medical Journal which is a highly highly respected medical journal agency reported that two leading researchers anthony fauci head of the ni a d and his deputy Clifford Lane received payments relating to their development of il-2 as a treatment for HIV / aids dr.

Lane told the BMJ that the payment was part of his federal compensation he explained that the government patented the development and shared the payments it received with the inventors since 1997 he has received about $45,000 she's saying that Clifford Lane the deputy of the niaD and doctor foul Chi did this for forty five thousand dollars to forego your Creed to protect people and instead to watch millions died dr. Anthony foul she told the BMJ that as a government employee he was required by law to put his name on the patent for the development of aisle two and was also required by law to receive a part of the payment the government received for use of the patent he said that he felt it was inappropriate to receive payment and donated the entire amount to charity if she wants me to believe the claims she's making here she needs to disprove this this is one of the things that I've been saying and would like to say to president Trump repeal the bayh-dole act that Act gave government workers the right to patent their discoveries so to to claim intellectual property for discoveries that the taxpayer paid for ever since that happened in the early eighties it destroyed science the by Doyle Act was an act that was passed with bipartisan support both Democrats and Republicans supported because they saw the value in it initially the way scientific research was funded by the federal government would be they would give money to a research institution and whatever that research institution found the government would own the patent to it now in theory this is great because the government would own that patent and then if they wanted to use it or sell it all the money would come back to the taxpayers but in practice it's not what happened what actually happened was the government collected all these patents and then 95% of them sat collecting dust making no money for the taxpayer and no scientific revolution was happening so now after by Doyle what's happening is Harford gets a small grant for the government less than three million dollars usually they find some kind of interesting piece of preliminary research they patent it and then they license it out to private companies who invest heavily in the promise of getting one of these drugs and making money in the future and from that scientific innovation flourishes and as a side benefit the taxpayers make more money because of this bile Doyle act we've brought a trillion dollars into our economy which has then taxed and brought back to us as taxpayers it's also created something like 4 million jobs and over 11,000 startups and it also has a march in clause that lets say the government gave a 2 million dollar grant to Harvard they then patent whatever research they found they license it to a pharmaceutical company now the pharmaceutical company creates a drug or a vaccine and starts charging obscene amounts of money for it or fails to actually put it out because the company goes out of business well guess what there's a clause in this Act that allows the federal government to step in and take over that patent all in all this public private sector collaboration is what makes innovation thrive and if you take one part of that equation out the whole system crumbles if you let the government run the system completely there's not enough innovation if you let the private sector run it completely too much price gouging not enough competition you need to have that healthy balance now this doesn't mean that pharmaceutical companies are all good and we should not police them or there's not shady things that happen oh my god do shady things happen but this vile doral Act is not the problem and this is the crime behind letting somebody like Bill Gates with billions of dollars nobody elected him he has no medical background he has no expertise but we let people like that have a voice in this country while we destroy the lives of millions of people Bill Gates is one of the greatest philanthropic figures of our time if not the biggest donor should we let Bill Gates guide our medical decisions no you're right he has no medical expertise it's not for to guide our medical decisions but if scientists come to Bill Gates asking for money he's able to choose who he wants to donate to he does not make money from this in fact last I heard the Gates Foundation was running 70 clinical trials to create a corona virus vaccine that they said that they would not make money on they would not patent to any of it so that the general public can have access to it at low cost this is amazing actually the USA Today even came out and debunked the theory that one of the Gates Foundation subsidiaries could have had a patent on something related to corona virus it just wasn't true unless you show me evidence of the Gates Foundation profiting from this everything you're saying is just it's just your thoughts and while your thoughts are great they mean nothing without facts if we activate mandatory vaccines globally I imagine these people stand to make hundreds of billions of dollars I'm not sure who he means these people they're gonna stand to make hundreds of billions of dollars first of all if the Bill Gates Foundation actually finds the corona virus vaccine and it's the one that's used they already said they're not gonna patent it they're gonna make it free so that's already untrue there it's also important at home for you to know that anytime the federal government puts out a recommendation for a vaccine it's automatically by law covered by your insurance company to the point that you have zero out-of-pocket expenses are you anti vaccine oh absolutely not I'm in fact vaccine is immune therapy just like interferon alphas immune therapy so I'm not anti vaccine it's interesting she says she's not anti vaccine her book has a foreword in it by Robert F Kennedy who's one of the leading anti-vaccine dividuals and from what I read about the background of this documentary it was funded by a lot of folks who are part of what's known as the anti vaccine community why would you want to be involved with this documentary if you know that that's like being horribly against the pharmaceutical industry and then taking money for pharma to be in a commercial do you believe that this virus was created in a laboratory I wouldn't use the word created but you can't say naturally-occurring if it was by way of the laboratory I got this is her giving her expert opinion that she believes that it was done in a lab I've seen other experts say that they believe that it could totally have come from nature and jumped from animal species to human species I also don't think that points really important because there's never been any evidence to say that this was deliberate in fact if it was deliberate this would be the worst ploy of all time it's destroying the world economy affecting everyone and do you have any ideas of where this occurred oh yeah yeah I'm sure it occurred between the North Carolina Laboratories Fort Detrick US Army Research Institute of infectious disease and the Wuhan laboratory how can you be sure there's so many biologists who have the same specialty as you that say that it could have easily come from a specific animal species and then jump to humans and then you're sure that it happened between these laboratories I think even scientists should be comfortable with the unknown or the fact that they may be wrong three point seven million dollars flowed from the National Institutes of Health here in the u.s.

To the Wuhan lab in China the same lab where many people have said that this coronavirus infection first originated the United States gives grants all the time in fact when you're talking about research on viruses it takes an international collaboration for that to work because we know very well that anytime you have a virus outbreak that can spread in one country it's going to end up in another country if the virus has any kind of infectivity at all that's why it becomes a pandemic so we have to be collaborative and give research grants and study each other's research that's part of it that doesn't show any kind of maliciousness or negative intent if my husband were to die who has COPD his lungs have fibrosis his lungs would look exactly like somebody with kovat 19 theoretically but he has no evidence of infection so if you're not testing and you don't have evidence of infection and if you walked in there today you know they call it Kovan 19 if you're coming in for a broken leg and your leg gets infected and you end up dying from that in fact we won't just put covet 19 on your death certificate if you had covet 19 you were screened and tested for and you came positive we would that would be counted in the death toll and you may think that's unfair that's inaccurate it may increase the numbers all we have to do is look at overall mortality for the last few years in a place like New York City and you'll see that every wintertime mortality spikes but if you look at the spike for 2020 it's outrageous how many more people have died you may be upset about the way we're categorizing them Kovan related not kovat related kovat presumed but more people are dying and the only thing that changes kovat 19 in fact more people are staying home now because of social distancing meaning that less trauma less car accidents but the deaths skyrocketed when I'm writing up my death report I'm being pressured to add kovin why is that why are we being pressured to add Kovan to maybe increase the numbers and make it look a little bit worse than it is no one's being pressured the CDC puts out recommendations of how you decide what someone has passed from and you're free to follow those recommendations or not as a practicing physician I filled out death certificates when I was a resident I would do death pronouncements all the time and there are things that you write that contributed to a person's demise for example if someone had kidney cancer and it was in end-stage kidney cancer and while they were dying from kidney cancer they got a pneumonia on top of that I would put both on the death certificate I can't say exactly which one is the reason they died because you can't just say one thing so yes if someone has a heart attack but they're also having a kovat infection it's very reasonable to put both on the death certificate and counted towards the Cova death toll now whether or not you think this would create misinformation that's your choice but again look at the amount of people that have died in comparison to the last ten years the numbers have skyrocketed and it's simply because of this kovat outbreak I've talked with doctors who have admitted that they are being incentivized to list patients that are sick or have died with kovat 19 yeah $13,000 for Medicare if you call it Cove in 19 right now Medicare determined that if you have a Cove in nineteen admission to the hospital you'll get paid $13,000 if that Cove in nineteen patient knows on a ventilator you get thirty nine thousand dollars three times as much a thirteen thousand and the thirty nine thousand dollar figure are accurate this is how hospitals are reimbursed for kovat nineteen patients now while it sounds like they're getting paid more to diagnose more the reality of the fact is these types of bundled payments actually save us money let me explain before these types of bundled payments the way hospitals would bill insurance companies for treatment would be to say we did this we gave these medications the patient stayed this long these are the doctors they saw these are the skilled technicians that took care of them and they would bill for all these surfaces and what we found was they were just wasting a lot of money and not delivering great care so what CMS did was they said let's take an average in an area of how much hospitals are spending on a typical pneumonia case on a heart-attack case and make it a standardized payment that then the hospital has to make do with in treating the patient and what came out of that well the hospital's became more effective they said we need to be more cost effective and we need to deliver better quality care to get patients better sooner so they can leave and we can save some of that extra money for ourselves as a profit the reason why we're paid $13,000 is because we're spending time resources medications on that patient and on average it costs $13,000 to deliver that care in some areas maybe they'll cost less than that and therefore you're left with more profit in other cases it gets really complicated and it costs a lot more than that and you lose money but on average it should cost around thirteen thousand dollars that's the fair rate set by CMS again this is very effective both in terms of cost saving measures and patient outcomes now the thirty-nine thousand dollar figure for ventilators it's not like hospitals are getting a three times bonus by putting someone on a ventilator ventilators cost money respiratory therapists needs to get billed for their time if a patient is put on a ventilator they need to be sedated with expensive medications they need to be put into the ICU the reason hospitals are being paid 39 thousand dollars is because it costs more to deliver that level of care it's not because now the hospital is getting rich by putting someone on a ventilator the hospital's actually incentivized to deliver just enough care in order to get the most money out of it but at the same time get the patient better as soon as possible the patients I'm seeing in front of me the lungs I'm trying to improve have led me to believe that we are operating under a medical paradigm that is untrue and I fear that this misguided treatment will lead to a tremendous amount of harm to a great number of people in a very short time when used improperly ventilators can cause lung injury this is a well known phenomenon however when you have a new condition like Cova 19 which we've never seen before we try and do our best and adapt to the situation as quickly as possible does that mean we're going to be perfect and we're not going to make mistakes and patients aren't going to suffer absolutely not whether you're an ICU doctor family medicine doctor nephrologist you have protocols that you're used to seeing patient comes in with condition X you know treatment for that is why you need to order blood test a B and C to monitor their progress and you follow these protocols that you've learned over your lifetime and you know how to adapt but with kovat 19 we're seeing really unique cases that we've just never seen described in medical literature before so we're trying to learn very quickly but in this process unfortunately patients have lost their lives this is not because we're actively trying to harm our patients this is simply because we're facing an unprecedented pandemic with a viral condition that is new to us I want to know why Italy was hit so hard Italy has a very old population they're very sick with inflammatory disorders they got at the beginning of 2019 an untested new form of influenza vaccine that had four different strains of influenza including the highly pathogenic h1n1 flu shots carry multiple strains of the influenza virus we do that to increase the probability of the vaccine being successful the cuz we have to actually predict the strains that are gonna be circulating that season it's very difficult and that's why the flu shot is almost never a hundred percent effective it usually carries an effectiveness rate of forty to sixty percent depending on which viruses are out and how well we predicted them that vaccine was grown in a cell line a dog cell line dogs have lots of coronaviruses and that's why they're not testing there she said that because this flu virus came from cells of dogs and dogs have coronaviruses therefore these people have corona viruses therefore they're not being tested honestly just it's a purely illogical statement like there's no other way to put that humans have corona viruses in fact if you ever had the common cold the odds are once in your life it was caused by a corona virus the two most common virus is causing the common cold are the Rhino virus followed by the corona virus she's taking things that are happening simultaneously and connecting them without any kind of proof of this causation experts are allowed to have theories and a lot of these theories will be proven to be incorrect that's part of the scientific process but you have to approach this with a level of humility by knowing that anytime you're putting out a theory it could be wrong and I don't feel like she's doing that here by acting as if what she's saying is a hundred percent accurate with no evidence to back it up one question remains what happened to Alba hydroxychloroquine we know that hydrochloric when zinc this gentleman here is a chiropractor not a medical doctor an osteopathic physician are working great for patients and then found she comes out says while there's no double-blind control to see most study which by the way dr.

Fauci is there going to be a double-blind controlled besito study of your vaccine I've actually watched that entire clip of him giving advice to patients and as part of that advice he recommended that if anyone has symptoms related to Cova 19 they should go out and get tonic water he knows that there is quinine in tonic water which is also an anti-malaria drug similar but not exactly the same as hydroxychloroquine and he believes that it would help you if you have kovat 19 however what our chiropractor friend here fails to understand is that the FDA limits the amount of quinine in tonic water to about 83 milligrams which means you're gonna need to be drinking 12 litres of tonic water every eight hours this is what happens when someone doesn't have a total grasp of scientific research starts making recommendations the fact that they used him in this documentary shows to me at least that they don't care who their sources are they don't even check for accuracy in a survey polling nearly 2,300 doctors in some 30 countries hydroxychloroquine was ranked as the most effective medication to treat the virus how is a really weird survey it literally asked doctors what do you think is the frontrunner for treating kovat 19 and doctors voted because you know they estimated which medicine they thought was going to be best and they said hydroxychloroquine and it doesn't mean that that means it works you need randomized controlled studies to make that happen however let me not get ahead of myself here we are using hydroxychloroquine in our hospitals we are giving it to patients those who are admitted those who are not doing well with kovat 19 who are on ventilators life support cannot wait for randomized controlled studies the FDA said in this situation we can use an EU a which is an emergency use authorization to prescribe hydroxychloroquine for our patients and honestly our results thus far don't look great because patients are still dying taking hydroxychloroquine and the reason why the AMA stepped in and said hey doctors stopped prescribing this was because the day after president Trump announced that he thought this could be a potential game-changer again someone that's not a medical expert giving their opinion the dose is prescribed of it's skyrocketed and then there became not enough of the medication for people who needed it for its legitimate fda-approved uses like malaria rheumatoid arthritis other autoimmune conditions the AMA was saying you know doctors will lose their license if they use hydroxychloroquine the anti-malarial drug that's been on the list of essential medicine worldwide for 70 years dr.

Falchi calls that anecdotal data doctor foul she does not call hydroxychloroquine a medication that's based on anecdotal data hydroxychloroquine is absolutely an fda-approved medication for several conditions malaria rheumatoid arthritis autoimmune conditions and the AMA has never said that if you use it for these approved uses you will lose your license that is utter nonsense what they said was if you start using it for unapproved reasons like for the potential that it may help with Cova 19 in patients who don't yet need this medication desperately you are committing malpractice and that's a very reasonable approach to take why because the only people who should be taking hydroxychloroquine before we have randomized controlled studies to prove its effectiveness and safety are the people who can't wait for those studies and who are ill now otherwise you're just putting the general public at risk and depleting our stockpiles of this medication for patients who need it for their conditions now it's not storytelling if we have thousands of pages of data saying it's effective against these families of viruses these thousands of pages she's talking about happen in animal models and lab models not in humans we've never compared it to a control group properly so because of that we cannot state that it's approved for a use we cannot state that it's safe to use in this condition there was an old antiviral drug hundred-year-old drug called sermon on the w-h-o list of essential medicine it literally gave kids with autism a voice a life what did their and Monsanto do they took it away from everybody you couldn't get it to save your life right now and we tried if a company a pharmaceutical company had a medicine that worked for autism why in the world would they give up those profits and shelf that medicine it's not like they're doing it in lieu of another treatment that's gonna make them more money we don't have a medication for autism just like it just doesn't make sense to me what she's saying is it safe to say that anything that cannot be patented has been shut down intentionally because there's no way to profit from it all these natural remedies that we you've had for ever absolutely that's fair to say if we had all of these natural remedies forever why was there disease before the pharmaceutical industry if we had all these natural remedies short answer is we didn't before antibiotics we suffered before vaccines we suffered with the invention of antibiotics vaccines we've drastically increased length of life in the world to say that natural remedies could have done all that is purely inaccurate it just it's very inaccurate I will say though that there is a financial component involved in medical research unless pharmaceutical companies stand to make money from a product they will not research it generally speaking so you have to find ways to incentivize them so I do think that in the world there exist certain products that because there's not a lot of money to be made from them they've been largely ignored that's not the same as saying what does gentleman just said that they've been intentionally shut down I don't think that's happening and I haven't seen evidence for it especially in this documentary the game is to prevent the therapies till everyone is infected and push the vaccines knowing that the flu vaccines increase the odds by 36 percent of getting Kovan 19 she said the ideas to push all the therapies aside so that everyone can get infected and then we get a vaccine doctor foul she came on my youtube channel and said very clearly that it is his belief and the general consensus of experts that if you get sick with Kovan 19 you are most likely going to be immune from getting it again I would be willing to bet on my experience and I'll bet your experience that any virus that you have if you do well recover and clear the virus if it acts like any other virus you're gonna have lasting immunity so if everyone is in fact it with it why would we need a vaccine it doesn't make sense we don't want people infected with it here the government is saying please stay home so this virus doesn't spread and she says no no the government wants everyone to get sick that's why they're not letting hydroxychloroquine be used you can't have a both ways and push the vaccines knowing that the flu vaccines increased the odds by 36 percent of getting covin 19 where does that data come from a publication last year where the military who had been vaccinated with influenza were more susceptible to corona viruses the authors of this study actually would disagree with dr.

Judy here because what they found was by getting the influenza vaccine participants were less likely to get influenza they were also less likely to get other types of viruses in general when you look at all the viruses that they could get what they did see with some natural variation most of the viruses went down someone slightly up one of the viruses that went up where coronaviruses this is a type of natural variation you can't say that the influenza vaccine caused those corona viruses to occur and on top of it the simplest thing here that was missed is that those corona viruses are not the corona virus of today they're not SARS co2 they're not the corona viruses that caused kovat 19 just because they're from the same family doesn't mean they'll behave in the same way there's just a lot of fundamental errors in the way that she explains this corona viruses are in every animal so if you've ever had a flu vaccine you were injected with corona viruses the fact that she said if you had a flu vaccine you were injected with corona virus is horribly inaccurate our immune system is used to touching we shared bacteria Staphylococcus streptococcal bacteria viruses we develop an immune response daily to this stuff when you take that away from me my immune system drops as I shelter in place my immune system drops what does doctor is talking about is something called a hygienic theory and this hygienic theory is actually the exact opposite of what this doctors saying when you overly protect yourself you boil your children's water you don't allow them to play in the dirt you constantly disinfecting everything and anything that you touch you're not exposed enough to viruses and bacterias so your immune system actually goes up not drops and it actually goes up to the point where it starts overreacting to non threats and as a result we've seen increases in autoimmune in allergies because we don't have those bacterias and viruses that we need to be exposed to so he's right but he there's a misunderstanding there it actually increases your immune system or over boosts your immune system there's a similar theory in allergenic foods for children before we used to not give children peanuts and as a result so many of them develop peanut allergies but what we saw through medical research we gave children peanuts early on they were exposed to it therefore they didn't develop the allergies which is an overreaction of the immune system so yes you need to be exposed to viruses bacteria in order to be healthy and for your immune system to function optimally completely agree with that but now during a pandemic when you need to shelter in place for a period of six to eight weeks that is not going to harm your immune system either up or down to the point where it's gonna destroy your flora and now you can't protect yourself from illness if that was the case we would just not survive as humans as long as we have we can easily adapt to these circumstances especially because even if we don't go outside we're covered in bacteria millions in trillions of bacteria are on and inside of us it is part of our natural flora and just because we not may not be going outside a lot we still go to a grocery store we walk our dogs we spend a little time in the park that is more than enough of exposure to bacteria and viruses that your body needs in order to function optimally and then as we all come out of shelter-in-place with a lower immune system and start trading viruses bacteria what do you think is going to happen disease is gonna spike what will happen and I'm very confident of this about disease going up once this pandemic comes to an end those who were having symptoms of some kind of medical condition and didn't go get care because they were worried about getting sick with kovat 19 are then going to present to the hospital with much more advanced cases which is why on my youtube channel on television I've been telling patients if there's something you're concerned about your body do not hesitate to call your family medicine doctor to visit a hospital why because there's other options available you can do a virtual visit you can come in through an isolation exit where you're not going to get exposed to kovat 19 and the reason why we ask patients to stay away initially this pandemic was so we can make the hospital safe place for everyone wearing the mass literally activate your own virus wearing the mask actually activates your own virus I can't even begin to process what that means wearing the mask does not protect you wearing the mask protects your respiratory droplets from entering the environment getting others sick and you may save yourself well I'm not sick I don't look sick well yeah we've seen a lot of people who don't show symptoms actually be spreading this virus that's why it's been so tricky that's why it's so different from the flu they've done such a great job at manipulating the masses that it's other people shutting down other citizens and the big tech platforms follow suit and they shut everything down there is no dissenting voices allowed anymore in this free country their dissenting voices and I'm hearing them right now and no one's arresting them for saying this that is the definition of free speech whether or not a company wants to put you on their server is not free speech it's about public free speech you're allowed to go say and hold any belief you want as long as it's not putting the public in danger I think we face a really difficult situation and talking about takedowns on social media for example the to urging care doctors that were shown earlier in this clip their video was taken down from YouTube it's really it's a fine line because I'm a firm believer of putting out accurate information to combat misinformation and I'm a firm believer that we need to listen to dissenting opinions until they get to the point where they become dangerous and/or absurd I guess when I say absurd I think about Alex Jones salad minute I will eat my neighbor's I think YouTube or any other social media platform should feel very free to take that content down now whether or not we should take content down of doctors we disagree with I think it's difficult I think in a in a situation like this where we're in a pandemic there's evolving medical info doctors are allowed to have different opinions I think that unless someone is directly advocating for harm like eating Tide Pods or something I think only then should you be taking down content and I'm blown away why there are not more doctors like me talking about this all over the place we should be banding together right now you need to wake up because your liberties are getting taken away from you all because of fake news I don't know what freedoms are being taken away from him we're recommending people to socially distance themselves and enforcing that to protect the general public and doctors are coming together in fact I did a video interviewing 100 doctors sharing their journeys and how different we all are but at the same time we're so unified in our message about getting people to stay home about why it's gonna break our hospital system in fact I would love to invite this chiropractor to come into a hospital setting and see where patients are being treated for Koba 19 so he understands why the social distancing is a must at least for the short term until we figure out what's what and then we could start reopening America strategically smartly and safely it's not the scientists who are in any way dishonest they're listening to people who for more than forty years have controlled who gets funded what gets published and I'm sorry to say many many people will simply take the money and the fame and that support things that absolutely aren't true are people betraying their ethics and going for the money at times absolutely absolutely I'm not one of those people that believes everyone just wants to do things for the greater good no no no people need to be incentivized and sometimes they make the wrong choices and let money guide them instead of what their initial goals were or at least maybe their initial goals were always money that's not a formula for success a and B I don't think it's representative of the medical community as a whole the huge majority of medical professionals nurses doctors paramedics pharmacists they've went into this to help people they did not go into this to make a killing financially there's other ways to make money where you don't have to go through horrendous hours of education and training for it over a decade of your life in order to make a decent living after getting hundreds of thousands of dollars in loans you don't get funded if you don't speak the party line you don't get published that was probably the hardest thing for me to take is understanding that scientific journals would would twist the discovery that should have healed all do I think that if you have a radical idea in the medical community initially you'll be ostracized yes I think that's part of the process if you look at any of the people that I've made revolutionary discoveries in science we're always looked at with a lot of skepticism initially but you have to approach new ideas with the level of healthy skepticism otherwise you'll just believe a lot of inaccurate information and it's a very difficult job of agencies like the NIH CDC w-h-o to decide which theories they should test so what we did pretty much ever since I got out of jail we started an education company we wake up doctors and it's very difficult but every doctor who realized they may have been part of the problem has now turned that around to march toward a better society and restore faith in the promise of medicine I can sit all day and talk about the things that are wrong with medicine but as a whole we're helping people we're eradicating diseases we're decreasing the strain on our healthcare system of Cova 19 by treating patients by finding vaccines to say that the entire system is a fraud because she believes it to be without any kind of research to say that it is I think it's a failure on her part more than it is ours I want to leave off with a message to my fellow doctors and medical professionals out there I think we need to do a better job with our scientific communication how we talk to people we should not resort to heavy data sarcasm or even takedowns in order to silence this type of information allow dissenting opinions to be heard confront them correct them and put the accurate medical info out there so people can make the decisions for themselves also know that I'm not the only doctor sharing this message here's actually a video of a hundred doctors that I've interviewed talking about their battle with Kovac 19 [Music]

You May Also Like